Documentos CODS. No. 4. Servicios ecosistémicos urbanos en Latinoamérica. Oportunidades para el desarrollo urbano sostenible, la acción climática y la gestión de la biodiversidad urbana

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorInostroza, Luis
dc.contributor.authorGaray Sarasti, Henry
dc.contributor.authorAndrade Pérez, Germán
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-03T19:51:56Z
dc.date.available2026-03-03T19:51:56Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.descriptionEste documento examina la gestión de los servicios ecosistémicos urbanos como un eje clave para articular la sostenibilidad urbana con la conservación de la biodiversidad y la acción climática en América Latina. En el marco de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible, analiza los aportes y desafíos de las ciudades frente al cambio climático y el bienestar humano, e identifica oportunidades de política pública y líneas de investigación para fortalecer la gestión ambiental urbana en la región.
dc.format.extent28 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de los Andes
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Séneca
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1992/78343
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad de los Andes
dc.publisherVicerrectoría de Investigación y Creación
dc.publisherCentro de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
dc.publisher.placeBogotá
dc.relation.referencesAlberti, M., 2005. The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 28, 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017605275160
dc.relation.referencesAlberti, M., 2005. The Effects of Urban Patterns on Ecosystem Function. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 28, 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017605275160
dc.relation.referencesAldana-Domínguez, J., C. Montes & J.A. Gonzalez. 2018. Understanding the Past to Envision a Sustainable Future: A Social - Ecological History of the Barranquilla Metropolitan Area (Colombia). Sustainability 10, 2247; doi10.3390/su100072247
dc.relation.referencesAndersson, E., Tengö, M., McPhearson, T., Kremer, P., 2015. Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability. Ecosyst. Serv. 12, 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002
dc.relation.referencesAndrade, A. Herrera, B., C. Gatti, R (Eds.). 2010 Building resilience to climate change: Ecosystem-Based Adaptation and Lessons from the Field. Ecosystem Management Series 9 (IUCN). Gland, Switzerland, 164 pp.
dc.relation.referencesAndrade, G. I., F. Remolina & D. Wiesner. 2013. Assembling the pieces: a framework for the integration of multi-functional ecological main structure in the emerging urban region of Bogotá, Colombia Urban Ecosystems. DOI 10.1007/s11252-013-0292-5
dc.relation.referencesAngel, S., Parent, J., Civco, D.L., Blei, A., Potere, D., 2011. The dimensions of global urban expansion: Estimates and projections for all countries, 2000- 2050. Prog. Plann. 75, 53–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. progress.2011.04.001
dc.relation.referencesAniello, C., Morgan, K., Busbey, A., Newland, L., 1995. Mapping micro-urban heat islands using LANDSAT TM and GIS. Comput. Geosci. 21, 965–969.
dc.relation.referencesBaró, F., Haase, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Frantzeskaki, N., 2015. Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: A quantitative assessment in five European cities. Ecol. Indic. 55, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.013
dc.relation.referencesBarrera, F. De, Henríquez, C., Coulombié, F., Dobbs, C., Salazar, A., 2018. Periurbanization and conservation pressures over remnants of native vegetation : impact on ecosystem services for a Latin-American capital city. Chang. Adapt. Socio-Ecological Syst. 4, 21–32.
dc.relation.referencesBarrera, F. de la, Henriquez, C., Ruiz, V., Inostroza, L., 2019. Urban Parks and Social Inequalities in the Access to Ecosystem Services in Santiago, Chile, in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757- 899X/471/10/102042
dc.relation.referencesBertram, C., Rehdanz, K., 2015. Preferences for cultural urban ecosystem services: Comparing attitudes, perception, and use. Ecosyst. Serv. 12, 187– 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.011
dc.relation.referencesBolund, P., Hunhammar, S., 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol. Econ. 29, 293–301. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
dc.relation.referencesBowler, D.E., Buyung-Ali Lisette, Knight, T.M., Pullin, A.S., 2010. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 10, 456.
dc.relation.referencesBraat, L.C., de Groot, R., 2012. The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst. Serv. 1, 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011
dc.relation.referencesBrander, L.M., Koetse, M.J., 2011. The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 2763–2773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvman.2011.06.019
dc.relation.referencesBuchel, S., Frantzeskaki, N., 2015. Citizens’ voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services 20 | Servicios ecosistémicos urbanos en Latinoamérica by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Ecosyst. Serv. 12, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecoser.2014.11.014
dc.relation.referencesClergeau, Ph. « Urban biodiversity: is there such a thing? », Cybergeo : European Journal of Geography [En ligne], Dossiers, mis en ligne le 12 avril 1996, consulté le 13 septembre 2019. URL : http://journals. openedition.org/cybergeo/277 ; DOI : 10.4000/ cybergeo.277
dc.relation.referencesCostanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., Grasso, M., 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst. Serv. 28, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
dc.relation.referencesCostanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., Giovannini, E., 2014. Time to leave GDP behind. Nature 505, 283–285.
dc.relation.referencesDennis, M., James, P., 2016. Considerations in the valuation of urban green space: Accounting for user participation. Ecosyst. Serv. 21, 120–129. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.003
dc.relation.referencesDickinson, D.C., Hobbs, R.J., 2017. Cultural ecosystem services: Characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research. Ecosyst. Serv. 25, 179– 194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.014
dc.relation.referencesDobbs, C., Escobedo, F.J., Clerici, N., Barrera, F. De, Eleuterio, A.A., Macgregor-fors, I., Reyes-paecke, S., Vásquez, A., Danilo, J., Camaño, Z., Hernández, H.J., 2018. Urban ecosystem Services in Latin America: mismatch between global concepts and regional realities? Urban Ecosyst. 22, 173–187. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11252-018-0805-3
dc.relation.referencesDou, Y., Zhen, L., De Groot, R., Du, B., Yu, X., 2017. Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality. Ecosyst. Serv. 24, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecoser.2017.02.011
dc.relation.referencesEigenbrod, F., Bell, V.A., Davies, H.N., Heinemeyer, A., Armsworth, P.R., Gaston, K.J., 2011. The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278, 3201–3208. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2754
dc.relation.referencesElmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., Wilkinson, C., 2013a. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. A Global Assessment. Spinger Netherlands, Dordrecht. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1
dc.relation.referencesElmqvist, T., Redman, C.L., Barthel, S., Costanza, R., 2013b. History of Urbanization and the Missing Ecology, in: Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., Wilkinson, C. (Eds.), Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 13–30. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1
dc.relation.referencesEscobedo, F.J., Adams, D.C., Timilsina, N., 2014. Urban forest structure effects on property value. Ecosyst. Serv. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.002
dc.relation.referencesFrancesconi, R., Martínez, I. y Díaz, P. (2014). Bienes y servicios ecosistémicos en la planificación y gestión de áreas urbanas consolidadas. Territorios, 30, 191- 218. doi: dx.doi.org/10.12804/territ30.2014.09.
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Baggethun, E., Barton, D.N., 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2012.08.019
dc.relation.referencesGüneralp, B., Mcdonald, R.I., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Marcotullio, P.J., Seto, K.C., 2013. Urbanization Forecasts, Effects on Land Use, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Services Burak, in: Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., Wilkinson, C. (Eds.), Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. A Global Assessment. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 437–452. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1
dc.relation.referencesGuzmán, A. E. Hes & K. Schwartz. 2011. Shifting governance modesw in wetland management: a case study of two wetlands in Bogota, Colombia. Environment and Planig C: Governement and Policy Volumne 29, pages 990-1003. doi:10.1068/c10144
dc.relation.referencesHasse, D. 2019. The Rural-Urban Gradient and Ecosystem Services. In. M. Sroeter (ed). Pp. 141- 146. Atlas of Ecosystem Services. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_23
dc.relation.referencesHein, L., van Koppen, C.S.A.K., van Ierland, E.C., Leidekker, J., 2016. Temporal scales, ecosystem dynamics, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystems services. Ecosyst. Serv. 21, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.008
dc.relation.referencesHolt, A.R., Mears, M., Maltby, L., Warren, P., 2015. Understanding spatial patterns in the production of multiple urban ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 16, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.08.007
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., 2019. Clustering Spatially Explicit Bundles of Ecosystem Services in A Central European Region Clustering Spatially Explicit Bundles of Ecosystem Services in A Central European Region, in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757- 899X/471/9/092027
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., 2017. Informal urban development in Latin American urban peripheries. Spatial assessment in Bogotá, Lima and Santiago de Chile. Landsc. Urban Plan. 165, 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2016.03.021
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., 2016. Climate change adaptation responses in Latin American urban areas. Challenges for Santiago de Chile and Lima, in: Nail, S. (Ed.), Cambio Climático. Lecciones de y Para Ciudades de América Latina. Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogota, pp. 391–420.
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., 2016. Measuring Urban Informality in Latin America. GIS Spatial Assessment of Informal Urban Development in Santiago de Chile, in: Procedia Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. proeng.2016.08.638
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., 2015. El mito de pristinidad y los usos efectivos del territorio de la región de Magallanes , Patagonia Chilena : Forestal , minería y acuicultura. Estud. Geográficos LXXVI, 141–175. https://doi. org/10.3989/estgeogr.201505
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., 2014a. Metabolismo urbano y apropiación de excedentes ecológicos. De la estepa a la arquitectura burguesa. Urbano 17, 31–44.
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., 2014b. Measuring urban ecosystem functions through ‘ Technomass ’— A novel indicator to assess urban metabolism. Ecol. Indic. 42, 10– 19. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2014.02.035
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., 2014c. Open spaces and urban ecosystem services. Cooling effect towards urban planning in South American cities. TeMA J. L. Use, Mobil. Environ. SI, 523–534.
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., Barrera, F. de la, 2019. Ecosystem Services and Urbanisation. A Spatially Explicit Assessment in Upper Silesia, Central Europe, in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092028
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., Baur, R., Csaplovics, E., 2013. Urban sprawl and fragmentation in Latin America : A dynamic quantification and characterization of spatial patterns. J. Environ. Manage. 115, 87–97.
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., Baur, R., Csaplovics, E., 2010. Urban Sprawl and Fragmentation in Latin America: A Comparison with European Cities. The myth of the diffuse Latin American city, Lincoln Institute Working papers. Cambridge, MA.
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., Csaplovics, E., 2014. Measuring Climate Change Adaptation in Latin-America. Spatial indexes for exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity to urban heat islands in Lima and Santiago de Chile Luis, Lincoln Institute working papers. Santiago de Chile.
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., Hamstead, Z., Spyra, M., Qhreshi, S., 2019. Beyond urban–rural dichotomies: Measuring urbanisation degrees in central European landscapes using the technomass as an explicit indicator. Ecol. Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.028
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., König, H.J., Pickard, B., Zhen, L., 2017. Putting ecosystem services into practice: Trade-off assessment tools, indicators and decision support systems. Ecosyst. Serv. 26, 303–305. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.004
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., Palme, M., De La Barrera, F., 2016. A heat vulnerability index: Spatial patterns of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity for Santiago de Chile. PLoS One 11, e0162464. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0162464
dc.relation.referencesInostroza, L., Tábbita, J.H., 2016. Informal Urban Development in the Greater Buenos Aires Area: A Quantitative-Spatial Assessment Based on Households’ Physical Features Using GIS and Principal Component Analysis, in: Procedia Engineering. pp. 2138–2146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. proeng.2016.08.806
dc.relation.referencesKnapp, S., D. Hasse, S. Klotz, & N. Schwarts. 2018. Do Urban Biodiversity and Urban Ecosystem Services Go Hand in Hand, or Do We Just HOpe It Is That Easy? Urban Transformations DOI 10.10007/978-3-3219- 59324-1_16
dc.relation.referencesKohsaka, R., Pereira, H.M., Elmqvist, T., Chan, L., Moreno-peñaranda, R., Morimoto, Y., Inoue, T., Iwata, M., Nishi, M., Mathias, L., Cruz, C.S., Cabral, M., Brunfeldt, M., Parkkinen, A., Niemelä, J., Kulkarnikawli, Y., Pearsell, G., Moreno-peñaranda, C.A.R., Morimoto, Y., Inoue, T., Parkkinen, A., Niemelä, J., Kulkarni-kawli, Y., Pearsell, G., 2013. Indicators for Management of Urban Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: City Biodiversity Index, in: Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P.J., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., Wilkinson, C. (Eds.), Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer International Publishing, Dordrecht, pp. 699–718. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1
dc.relation.referencesKong, F., Yin, H., Nakagoshi, N., 2007. Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: A case study in Jinan City, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 79, 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.013
dc.relation.referencesLa Rosa, D., Spyra, M., Inostroza, L., 2016. Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review. Ecol. Indic. 61, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolind.2015.04.028
dc.relation.referencesLangemeyer, J., Baró, F., Roebeling, P., Gómez- Baggethun, E., 2015. Contrasting values of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas: The case of park Montjuïc in Barcelona. Ecosyst. Serv. 12, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.016
dc.relation.referencesLuederitz, C., Brink, E., Gralla, F., Hermelingmeier, V., Meyer, M., Niven, L., Panzer, L., Partelow, S., Rau, A.L., Sasaki, R., Abson, D.J., Lang, D.J., Wamsler, C., von Wehrden, H., 2015. A review of urban ecosystem services: Six key challenges for future research. Ecosyst. Serv. 14, 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecoser.2015.05.001
dc.relation.referencesMaraja, R., Jan, B., Teja, T., 2016. Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green. Ecosyst. Serv. 17, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007
dc.relation.referencesMontoya, J., D. M. Ruiz, C. Matallana, G. I. Andrade & J. Díaz. 2018a. Áreas de conservación urbana. Escenarios irremplazables para la biodiversidad. En 405. Biodiversidad 2017. Estado y tendencias de la biodiversidad de Colombia. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Bogotá, D. C.
dc.relation.referencesMontoya, J. D. M. Ruiz, G. I. Andrade, C . Matallana, J. J. Díaz, J. Timoté, J. Azcárate, A. Areiza. 2018b. Visión integral para la gestión de las áreas protegidas urbanas en Colombia. Biodiversidad en la Practica. Volumen 3 (1): 11-16.
dc.relation.referencesMorancho, A.B., 2003. A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 66, 35–41. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00093-8
dc.relation.referencesMyers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Fonseca, G.A.B., Kent, J., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853, 853–858.
dc.relation.referencesPanduro, T.E., Veie, K.L., 2013. Classification and valuation of urban green spaces-A hedonic house price valuation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 120, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.009
dc.relation.referencesPeña - Porras, D. I. 2019. Gobernanza, vivienda y preservación ambiental urbana frente a los objetivos de desarrollo sostnible. Una reflexión para cinco ciudades latinoamericanas. Documentos CODS:
dc.relation.referencesRueda, S., 2002. Modelos urbanos y sostenibilidad, in: I Congreso de Ingeniería Civil, Territorio y Medio Ambiente. pp. 23–48.
dc.relation.referencesRobson, E., L van Kerkoff & S. Cork. 2019. Understanding citizen perceptions of the Eastern Hills of Bogota: a participatory place-based ecosystem service assessment. Urban Ecosystems 22:19-35 https://doi.org/10.1007/s1152-018-079-9
dc.relation.referencesSaphores, J.D., Li, W., 2012. Estimating the value of urban green areas: A hedonic pricing analysis of the single family housing market in Los Angeles, CA. Landsc. Urban Plan. 104, 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.012
dc.relation.referencesSherrouse, B.C., Clement, J.M., Semmens, D.J., 2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl. Geogr. 31, 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. apgeog.2010.08.002
dc.relation.referencesSpeiser, V., S. Ranganathan, R. Bali Y David, J. T. Sumpter. 2017. The sustainable development oxymoron: quantifying and modelling the incompatibility of sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 24:6 (457.-470) DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2016.1235624
dc.relation.referencesSun, R., Chen, L., 2017. Effects of green space dynamics on urban heat islands: Mitigation and diversification. Ecosyst. Serv. 23, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecoser.2016.11.011
dc.relation.referencesTratalos, J., Fuller, R.A., Warren, P.H., Davies, R.G., Gaston, K.J., 2007. Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan. 83, 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2007.05.003
dc.relation.referencesTyrväinen, L., 1997. The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landsc. Urban Plan. 37, 211–222. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0169-2046(97)80005-9
dc.relation.referencesTyrvainen, L., Vaananen, H., 1998. The economic value of urban forest amenities: An application of the contingent valuation method. Landsc. Urban Plan. 43, 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169- 2046(98)00103-0
dc.relation.referencesZimmermann, E., Bracalenti, L., Piacentini, R., Inostroza, L., 2016. Urban Flood Risk Reduction by Increasing Green Areas for Adaptation to Climate Change, in: Procedia Engineering. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.822
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.urihttps://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/static/pdf/aceptacion_uso_es.pdf
dc.subject.keywordServicios ecosistémicos urbanos
dc.subject.keywordSostenibilidad urbana
dc.subject.keywordBiodiversidad urbana
dc.subject.keywordCambio climático
dc.subject.keywordODS 11
dc.subject.keywordAmérica Latina
dc.titleDocumentos CODS. No. 4. Servicios ecosistémicos urbanos en Latinoamérica. Oportunidades para el desarrollo urbano sostenible, la acción climática y la gestión de la biodiversidad urbana
dc.typeDocumentos de trabajo
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/WP
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
DOC_CODS_4.pdf
Tamaño:
2.19 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
2.48 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Documentos CODS